I think it's a question of which reviewer is reviewing each game. That doesn't mean they need to score a game 1.5 points from what it should be so that they can seem "unbiased" and "cool", and pander to a whole different group of fans who don't even own that console or
that they need to score a game 1.5 or more points above what it should be, so that fans won't get mad at them if they gave it lower than what they thought. It's a fine line.
I only have a problem with two reviews.. One of them getting a score waaaay over deserved, and the other getting a score that stirred up a complete shitstorm because of how they reviewed it, and how the score was .1 away from a certain special score... It just seems to me like they did that last part on purpose.
And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.
Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive