By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cobretti2 on 18 February 2010
Edit Thread
Carl2291 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
But those are being base on other opinions of the game. Guess what, that's how I'm basing FFXIII is not that good of a game in terms of being a game. From what's indicated in all accounts, even from those that like it, the flow of the game turns out it's all about being flashy, with just some gameplay as padding between the cutscenes. And even though there are battles, it's more about being flashy as well, hence the faster battle flow.

You can think that, if you want. Your opinion and all. Even if you haven't played it.

I only brought Mario into it to shut milkyjoe up. He is basing his points from reviews, i can do the exact same thing for Ninty + Mario.

but you do realise a lot of game critics are 3d whores? some reviews knocked it for being a 2d game. Same thing happened with GTA on DS. Reviewers didn't like it cause it was 2D top view. Everyone said that oh GTA sold like shit cause the audience was not there. Guess what it did worst on PSP? where 3D gta games sold millions.

 

In final fantasy case lots of japanese didn't like it cause of the new direction of no towns and how it flowed

 

but like who really cares about mario or ff here.

 

The point here is 3rd party developers treat the Wii like shit. Then complain when games dont sell. how can they expect crap to sell? Even Nintendo has made crap like day of crisis or whatever it was called. That shitty game never sold. So devs can't say Nintendo only games sell, when the fact is only decent quality games sell.

 

They have no marketing.

They are sloppy made.

or They make some on rails crap no one wants.

Like RE4 a (4year old game) sold MUCH better than the other RE games because it wasn't on rails and it ACTUALLY WORKED GREAT with the Wii Remote. It does not take a genious to work out that another RE game in RE4 style would sell.