Halo Reach versus Killzone 2 HD screenshot comparison

[AlkamistStar]

leo-j said:
He is clearly contradicting himself..

Also, its hilarious that you guys call PS3 OWNERS TROLLS when the FACT yes FACT is KZ2 is LIGHT YEARS AHEAD OF HALO REACH GRAPHICLY at the moment.

There is no reason to compare either game at all, HALO IS HALO, KILLZONE IS KILLZONE. KZ2 looks a generation ahead of halo reach PERIOD. Don't even try to argue, you haven't played KZ to know shit.

Just be happy HALO REACH is looking technically more impressive than HALO 3. Call me a troll, but I am telling it llike it is, and if your too blind to admit the truth, then that's your problem.

Point 1.

"Don't even try to argue, you haven't played KZ to know shit." - If this was directed at me, your not only wrong, but have no clue about what games i play. Lemme guess, you saw my Halo: Reach thread signature, checked my games list for which titles i won, and assumed i never played Killzone 2, correct? No? Yes? Doesn't matter, because not only have i played Killzone 2, i've beaten it. Just like i've beaten Infamous, but still prefer Prototype.

Point 2.

kowenicki said that we should wait to see which game is better GRAPHICALLY (since you like to CAPS, maybe this will get through to you), "we dont know which will look better yet... that will become apparent as time passes" but went on to state his OPINIONS (as shown by his use of the word "personally") about the GAMEPLAY (a proven track record of past Halo titles). Your ignorance is classic.

Point 3.

You are trolling, and you've made it quite obvious. Your well known for it.