By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
c03n3nj0 said:
GameGuy100 said:
izaaz101 said:
GameGuy100 said:
thekitchensink said:
Um... those reasons don't make any sense.

1. Ok, I'll give you that one.
2. Teasing means they give you a little bit of information and make you beg for more.
3. Of course they'd be pulling the name from a Sonic game--that's kinda the point o.O
4. Ever played Sonic 1-3? He does plenty of swimming... or at least, he spends a fair amount of time underwater, so they could easily let him swim if they wanted to.


It's likely not going to happen, but you could have easily come up with better reasons.

Yes, he can spend time underwater, but it's as if he's "Steel Sonic" so to speak. Unlike Mario, he will sink and drown if there are no platforms for him to jump on.

He swam in the Olympics.

The only reason why he was able to "swim" in the Olympics was because he was wearing a lifejacket/special suit that allowed him to. He would normally sink and drown after a certain amount of time.

Do you actually think they will keep that consistent? There's no explanation why they're doing anything, it's just there for the gameplay's sake. And we're talking about Nintendo here, they always put gameplay first.

Anyways, it probably won't happen (although I think it would be awesome).

Yes, I do. If they don't keep it that way, that would be an error in the Sonic series of games. In other words, it wouldn't make any sense for Sonic being able to swim (without protection) in one game and not being able to swim in all of the other games.



I'm unbeatable at Mario Kart Wii and Pokémon Battle Revolution!

Dare to try?

http://www.wii-games-wii.com/images/Mario-kart-wii.jpg" width="124" height="100"> http://awschrick.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/pokemon-battle-revolution-wii-1.jpg" width="126" height="88">