Slimebeast said: Those criteria are good, but we don't know what they used in this case. There are other circumstances that make me sceptic too. One is that apparently they found response from 4 of 23 patients* in this Belgian/British study. I know it's mostly a gut feeling, but it just sounds remarkably high and 'too good to be true'. Only time will tell. |
I told my girlfriend about this last night and she called bullshit on it too. She's also a doctor, so maybe it's a medial thing. I dunno.