Mr Puggsly said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Hisiru said:
Mr Puggsly said:
guiduc said:
epicberserk said:
Too bad microsoft own them now for like 8 years LOL u wana play banjo your going have to get a xbox |
Nuts and Bolts sucks compared to the N64 games. These are classics.
|
And every Mario game sucks compared to Super Mario World.
But hey, an inferior game can still be fun.
|
You will find a huge ammount of quality in every 2D Mario game (even if Mario World is the best in your opinion) but you can't say the same thing about Nuts and Bolts.
The problem is that Nuts and Bolts isn't like the old games (objectives, gameplay etc) it's more like a bunch of minigames in one package and all the 2D mario games has a similar gameplay and objectives. Your comparison isn't that good.
|
Why compare Nuts and Bolts to previous game? Take it for what it is, an entertaining and unique platformer that was sold at a reduced price.
I'm not saying the Mario games have been bad or poor quality, but they aren't the best games in the franchise. I never met anyone that didn't like Super Mario World, but I know plenty of people that dislike or hate the 3D Mario games.
|
Honestly I know a lot of people that don't like 3D Mario as much as 2D Mario, but rarely have I ever met someone that dislikes 3D Mario unless they're either trying to troll Mario/Nintendo or just don't like platformers to begin with. As for which 2D Mario is the best SMB3 > SMW 
|
And I never met a gamer that didn't like SMB3 either.
|
This is subjective. I know a lot of people who love the 3D games (Mario 64 and Galaxy) but they hate the 2D games (even SMB3).
