Can I just say something here?
Am I the only one noticing a pattern with IGN when it comes to Zelda? Every list with Zelda in it so far is on the low end. Not to mention what the 2001 list said about Melee.
"Sure, pitting Mario against Samus is every Nintendo fan's dream.." Um...
No. it. isn't. Infact, not even Mario vs Link is everyones dream, but Mario vs Link is alot more popular of a subject than Mario vs Samus. They're making it a point to dodge Zelda. Also, they placed Okami 1st while Twilight Princess received merely 8th. A game constantly compared to Twilight Princess, in which a bit of an internet fad came up with people claiming it to be better than TP. Looks like they're joining in on the fad just to please the popular, or seemingly popular belief. Especially considering TP originally came in 4th with their top 25 Wii games list, in which it was higher than Okami.
Lastly, they picked Chinatown wars for the best DS game of 2009 over Spirit Tracks earlier. =/
I don't care what their real opinions are, but its so obvious they're ditching Zelda to seem more hardcore to the hardcores, or just to please people who think Zelda is overrated. That's just kind of pathetic, but you know what? They've always been like this. Catering to popular belief on the internet to show they're in where its at. Surely putting Zelda high on every list is being biased in the eyes of the internet, so now it needs to go down.
