Alic0004 said:
Seece said:
BMaker11 said:
Seece said:
@ MM - Yes I'm already aware of your argument, and I'm saying it's pants. Sony are still paying for exclusives and limiting people playing them. |
Sony directly funding a game =/= giving 3rd parties a check to make sure the game doesn't appear on the competition's console.
Your spin is ridiculous. To compare Sony actually putting their own manpower behind to a game to simply paying cash....is stupid, to say the least. What? Do you want Sony to send their teams of people to help develop a unique game, only to put it on the Xbox?
I mean, technically, by those means, they are "hypocrites", but you are really, REALLY grasping at straws. Hell....Uncharted 2 could've been developed for the 360 (maybe not be the game it is, but developed nonetheless), but it's a Sony studio that Sony pays for. They are therefore preventing other from playing their games. HYPOCRITES!!!
|
It's not the means it's the ends. Sony are paying for an exclusive just as Microsoft are, I don't care about which route they take, and no I don't want them to put them on Xbox.
|
You might as well say your girlfriend (or boyfriend) is a whore if they sleep with you after you buy them dinner.
There is such a thing as oversimplifying to the point that you are stuffing your fingers in your ears and ignoring reality.
There is a basic difference between investing in a small company that has an idea but no way to execute it, and investing in a huge public company that already had the budget and plan of making a bunch of games, and is already famous for making great games in the past. To say otherwise is to basically ignore all of modern capitalism.
I pointed that out in my post a few back, and as you can guess it makes me feel like it was all worth while when I see it completely ignored and not responded to, so we can continue to trade one liners back and forth until everybody decides to go play a video game instead. 
|
Exactly (oooooh I have like 3 posts in a row. My bad lol)
