Roar_Of_War on 20 January 2010
| Pavolink said: "Zelda has an audience with people who don't buy things like Wii Sports Resort, or at least with people who would say "If I wanted motion controls, I'd go looking for it somewhere else. If I want Zelda, I expect Zelda!" Well, I'm a Zelda fan and I have Wii Sports Resorts. And I want motion controls, that's one reason to buy Zelda Wii. Of course that if I want Zelda, I expect Zelda. But for Zelda Wii I'm expecting a new forced controls. If I want to play a Zelda with traditional gameplay, then I play Ocarina of Time, Majoras Mask or The Wind Waker. Everyone have their own opinion. But agree with you, Zelda Wii will sell less than 10 mill. |
I mostly meant that people who want forced motion controls wouldn't target Zelda for it, and would rather get something that isn't Zelda in order to get it. Zelda will almost definitely have forced motion controls, and even if there is an option, its still Zelda. A core franchise that simply can't become accessible enough to get 16 million sales. People looking for Motion+ would more likely look for Wii Sports Resort - something they know they'd like with little doubt about the rest of the game beyond the controls. Of course, Motion+ can only help Zelda's sales, but not quite that much. Its still Zelda. It can never become that accessible without ruining itself to the core gamers. Something Nintendo doesn't seem to realize just yet.
