vaio said:
steverhcp02 said:
richardhutnik said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Ail said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
"Right, you could pull off Assassins creed without a living breathing city and massive landscapes and combat."
San Andreas had all those things. While that's too much for the PS1, it's not too much for the Wii, so all that gets sacrificed is an expensive coat of paint. |
Have you played AC2 ?
You can climb every single building and move from top to top..
You can not interact with any San Andreas building, they are just blocks with shiny texture on top...
|
1. That was not among the things you listed.
2. Again, that was on the PS2, which the Wii would have room to add such abilities, even if it would have been too much on the PS2.
|
Couldn't you climb on top of the buildings in Spiderman 2 on the PS2, and also interact with the city?
|
Never played it but probably. But again, is this what the people bitching want? They want a game that was done 7 years ago? Whats the point in buying NEW games when theyve been done almost a decade ago?
|
now you are just arguing for the sake of arguing, if you could make a game like that 7 years ago with a lesser console then why cant you make a new game with those features with the wii 7 years later? or atleast try to make one before complaining that your games dont sell on that platform.
As I said before all wii owners want is a serious effort from theese big corps nothing else and if that serious effort doesnt work out then atleast I will stop bitching and enjoy my Nintendo games but untill then i will bitch.
|
Heres my question for you then. Why would these companies make a "serious" effort that goes completely away from what the console itself is. By this i mean its CLEAR the audience and owners of the Wii are vastly dominated by folks who dont really give two shits about what youre argueing. The wii just had the most successful month i can remember without the stuff youre asking, this alone points to WHY this isnt being done.
