V-r0cK said:
Agreed. And Ill be picking up a copy for PS3 as i enjoyed the demo too. "Though frame rate issues, frequent and extended load times, and less-crisp graphics make the PlayStation 3 version inferior to its Xbox 360 counterpart, it is nonetheless still a very enjoyable experience." - Gamespot 8.0 score. Since when is an +8.0 game not good enough these days? The media spoiled you all by throwing around +9.0 scores everywhere lol. ...Didnt Dragon Age have a less score for 360 than the PS3? Yet its selling over 500k more than the PS3 version. Seems like 360 owners knows how NOT TO pass up on a good game regardless of being 'inferior' lol |
That!
Rant on/
I don't get the mentality of "If the 360's version is infierior then it's okay but if the ps3 is inferior then there will be blood. DA was better on the ps3 than 360, ff13 is suppsoed to go the same way yet no one battered an eye lid so why is this such a big deal? Less we forget, if it wasn't for Sega (PG has denied all involvment with the ps3 version) ps3 only owners wouldn't even have a chance to play this game So better that than nothing right? If it wasn't for reviews, no one would have a clue and as per usual, a lot of mountains are rising out of mole hills. Yes a 6 second long transition from Play to Pause is perplexing but that's not the end of the world, if it bugs you that much buy it at a cut down price, seriously I sometimes wonder if I'm the only one that remembers that games don't stay at £40/$60 forever, they come down in price people. If it really bugs you that much, buy it for the 360 or better yet as a ps3 only owner buy a 360 just to play Bayonetta because I'm sure everyone who played DA on the 360 are crying in their cornflakes everyday but sure as hell won't be buying a ps3 just to play ff13. People these days are just too spoiled and don't bother thinking outside the hype and shit storm ¬_¬.
Rant Off/