ItsaMii said: Does anyone remember what the UK moderator said after Ubidays?
"The true of the matter is this, the Wii is a very different console than what most games developers are used to. The Wii has managed to make a huge success from having games on it that just would not work on a conventional console. The Wii has also managed to increase the market share to a huge group of people that are not that interested in gaming. With Wii Sports, Wii Fit and all manner of games built for family play, Nintendo know who they are marketing for and it is not die hard gamers. If you look at the most successful Wii games, they are not amazing new AAA games, they are predominantly family orientated games/alternative games. Maybe we are all being unfair to Ubisoft. They know what their market are and it is working really well. |
I hope that is sarcasm. If not then we are not being unfair to Ubisoft. They do not know their market. Red Steel sold over a million units but they did not develop another quality core game for the Wii. Instead they went for some imaginary audience to sell thier Imagine series of games to. Instead of diversifying their portfolio of DS and Wii games with a mixture of Casual and Core games like any developer should, they decided to just pursue one audience. This step had nothing but failure written all over it. Non of their games for that audience had depth that would allow everyone to play them. Instead they were shallow games that had limited value. But their greed did not let them see their mistake. They were too busy bragging about how they were growing their business and the new IPs that they created. Now that their house of cards has fallen their answer is to retreat.
What we've seen from Ubisoft, EA, and Capcom, to a certain extent, is how not to run a business.
If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba