Should Zelda Wii be alot more action-involved than previous installments?

[Helios]

Roar_Of_War said:

ultima said:

Roar_Of_War said:

Sadly, I don't think Zelda will ever be anything other than what Miyamoto wants it to be...

And that's a bad thing how?

In my opinion. Most people disagree with some directions Zelda has taken, and what kind of flaws the series has obtained because of it. Then fans think of ways to fix them, but they never seem to be implemented. Miyamoto obviously doesn't see them as flaws, but he thought no online for New Super Mario Bros. Wii was a good idea, too - When it could have sold so much better for solely that, and could have been the biggest hit since Donkey Kong.

It could have, but likely would not. Or what, did you actually have some kind of basis for that claim?

Also, it is thus far the fastest selling Mario game in history, and will no doubt surpass Donkey Kong with or without online.

As for Zelda, should it be "alot" of anything? I'm just glad none of the people online have any say in what goes into the next title in any Nintendo franchise.