same website, WKC import review same reviewer:
http://www.rpgfan.com/reviews/White_Knight_Chronicles/index.html
7/10 He wrote:
At the end of the day, WKC is hard to recommend for people who are looking for a good offline stand-alone adventure. Even where the game innovates, specifically the battle and avatar systems, the game slips up by improperly balancing damage and incentives and making the player-created character totally inconsequential. The story campaign is easily completed in 25 to 30 hours, so really the game makes an excellent rental. If it’s online gaming that you are focused on, add a few points to my final score and have at it. I suspect there will be some patches and changes for the North American release, and if they address even some of the problems mentioned here, you will have a very worthwhile game. Ultimately I think the franchise has potential. Nevertheless, it’s still very skip-able for people with a long backlog of games to get into.
...if you believe one, you gotta believe the other ones too.. :P So, WKC 65-70 metacritic confirmed?
WKC import final scores:
 |
|
| Graphics: | 85% |
| Sound: | 72% |
| Gameplay: | 72% |
| Control: | 74% |
| Story: | 68% |
| Overall: | 70% |
 |
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
