You can think of DNA as nature’s operating system. It carries all the instructions needed to make you, or a grape. And the grape has more genes. (Picture from the Scientific Creative Quarterly.)
The reason is that the DNA operating system runs McAfee. As Michael Specter writes this week in The New Yorker, roughly 10% of our DNA consists of retrovirus code, the equivalent of a McAfee anti-viral’s virus signatures.
Evolution encoded these retroviruses in our genes. They represent long-dead diseases that once threatened our ancestors with extinction, until this detection code was added. Grapes probably have more code because they’ve been around longer.
All this offers intriguing questions, not just about human viruses but about computing as well.
- Would it make sense to put anti-viral signatures in the center of the Internet, in its operating system as it were, rather than at the edge, as is done now?
- Can we encode the HIV virus into the human genome, rendering it harmless, and should we?
The 20th century saw enormous progress made against bacteria, through the development of antibiotics like penicillin. We have the chance to make the same progress against viruses, but the solution will raise more basic questions.
END----
I find this very interesting and also very scary. The idea that if we physically change our DNA outside of evolution we can build our own internal protection. However, at what consequence? Is there any medicine that has not had some side affect? One of the only TV shows I watch is Stargate. In the SG1 series there was a race called the Asgards. They died off because they kept tampering with thier DNA to help push along thier own evolution. Eventually they lost the ability to reproduce sexually and had to clone blank bodies that they could move thier concious (sp?) into. I think these ideas to artificially mutate our genes is very scary.
What do you think?
