naznatips said:
That makes no sense. Adjusting scores isn't the same as admitting you're wrong. We have editing for that. Reviews cannot possibly please everyone who reads them, so they just need to be accurate and well-justified. If there is inaccurate information in a review I will absolutely make sure that it's corrected, but it matching your opinion does not make it right or wrong. What makes it right or wrong is if it's well-justified for the score it does give the game, complete, and accurate. But, if anything by telling people they are "wrong" anytime you don't agree with their score of a game you are showing your own arrogance, not theirs. |
Oh that's a cop out. If you are doing your job correctly a written review and the score it represents are one in the same thing. Therefore if you admit you were wrong in a review you wrote, then your score is wrong too. Reviews aren't technical papers, they are personal opinion. Justification, while based off the features, is still personal in the conclusion you come to (why some people like certain genres or not). So no having the "ballz" to admit you are wrong and change it thereof isn't a sign of arrogance. Thinking that what you are writing is technical and the word of the almighty lord is the biggest load of arrogance ever. Reviewers, therefore, should have absolutely no issue changing a review score if they felt they reviewed improperly BASED on their own opinions because that is all it ever was to begin with.