Like some mentioned before me, it wouldn't be a bad idea to post a separate re-review on games that show things in hindsight. At the same time this can differentiate between games that were good at the time and other games that are truly classics. For example my opinion of OOT has not changed much at all. I can still play it today (actually beat it again less than 2 weeks ago and will probably play it again in a couple of months or so) and not get bored, and the graphics are definitely not an eyesore.
I could also say that nothing has changed my mind on SOTN and I still play it both on my PS3 and on my PSP 3000 when I am traveling just about anywhere. Now with MGS4 I liked it alot the first time I played it through, but on my second and third playthrough recently I find myself loving it even more. Now as much as I love FFVII overall for what it represents, I kinda struggled to finish it, whereas I playing FFVIII again I enjoyed it even more. I think in the end it just depends under criteria is used to re-review as well. It's not fair to compare graphics from SNES to the Wii, but alot of elements of gameplay can remain timeless. On an entirely PERSONAL note I don't see how SMG should even score past a 93, but I can see NSMBW score a 94 but SMB3 a 95 and so on.
Make games, not war (that goes for ridiculous fanboys)
I may be the next Maelstorm or not, you be the judge http://videogamesgrow.blogspot.com/ hopefully I can be more of an asset than a fanboy to VGC hehe.
