Also another note I would like to make about films in 2010. Speaking from someone who is familiar with the technology used in 3D film making, 3D should not be used unless artistically viable. However, 3D is tacked onto a lot of films nowadays for two reasons.
1. 3D movies are supposedly impossible to pirate (although I would like to have a go at this, I reckon I could do it) and so the piracy levels are lower.
2. The profit made on a 3D movie tends to be higher than that of a comparative 2D one from what I'm aware.
It's not particularly more difficult logistically to produce a 3D cartoon over a 2D one, movies are more difficult, but the two reasons I gave kind of justify the extra effort to make a 3D film and sacrifice artistic licence.
But I think unless you can pull of a 3D film well (like Avatar), then it shouldn't be in 3D and should stay in 2D for the sake of quality... And don't tack on cheesy effects.
Ok, I'll stop rambling now.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
