By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

^ So if the argument of being there first doesn't work, what does it matter in this case? It doesn't matter in the case of Israel, because Israel and the Jews are there already.

So if you say "We can argue that the land should never have been taken off them in the first place but the fact is it was and that can't be undone now." it means the current Israel should be accepted, right? Because the fact is that the Jews control Israel, the West Bank and Jerusalem and that can't be undone now, right?