StrifeHawkins said: Crysis graphics have already been surpassed in my opinion, i prefer, tales of versperia, gears of war 1 wipeout hd, killzone 2, uncharted series, because not only do you have good graphics but you have good frame rates, and much stronger online community, plus even a game like gt 5 has a better story than crysis. I have a 2.6 dual core pc with a nvidia gts 250 and 4 gig ddr5 ram, and my pc is overheating so i can only play crysis for 1 hour or so before i shut it down, im not interested in pc games anymore, if this is what they define excellence with! endlessly tweaking your setup, and having to buy ludicrously just to play game with a stable framerate the way it was meant to be played !! Im assuming i need to buy core 17 with P55 motherboard, and another gts 250 sli, just to play this game on high? this is not worth it! |
DDR5 ram? Where can I get me some of those? I would have bought DDR4 as a typo, but 3 and 5 are quite far away.
Also a tip for next time, save yourself some money off that DDR5 ram and get a case with good airflow. I also play it on high on a 9800 GT and scrape by on a measily DDR2 memory, so I have no damn idea what you are talking about.
I give this post a fail/10.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835