Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Seece said:
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Carl2291 said:
Red - Since when? They get sales compared, so games should also be compared.
|
Seece said:
Wait for it, he'll tell you it's out fault and HD fans are the ones spouting that it's not competition.
Fact of the matter is wii fans are touchy about metacritic because it just doesn't stack up ... thus they come out with a host of reasons why metacritic sucks.
|
Last gen did PS2 compare to GameCube or XBOX in graphics? No, everyone will agree the PS2 had the weaker graphics. And did PS2 have a TON of shovelware games compared to the other systems just like WII? Yes, people often complained about it, with games like Mary Kate & Ashley go Shopping or Ponez alive! But overall, their games that were deemed 'good' were often ranked equal or even better to that of the other two consoles. The PS2 had over 70 games above a 90 score on Metacritic. More than a few of them being of the puzzle, mini game or casual game variety.
This gen, Wii is in the same position, but its games are consistently downscored not only in graphics, but for things like 'lacks innovation' or for hidden metrics or BLATANT metrics in comparison to HD games (such as reviewers blatantly comparing them to games like GTAIV or Halo in their reviews).
So Sony gets a free ride last gen and Nintendo gets the microscope this gen? Or is it because of something else? Do enlighten me to why the Wii is in this predicament. I find most people like to blame the Wii or defend reviewers or point the finger back at people who bring up this topic..anything to keep from thinking there could be any truth in this scenario.
|
Wii is not in the same position, PS2 got massive dev support, Wii does not.
|
Ah yes, Wii has no games. Good comeback. Reminds me of a year ago and the standard comebacks for the PS3.
|
Didn't say that, Don't twist my words again. It's an obvious fact that the level of support for Wii is nowhere near what the PS2 had, and you come back with that pathetic quip? try again.
