Killzone 2 > MW2

[Squilliam]

CGI-Quality said:

Squilliam said:

CGI-Quality said:

Squilliam said:
Not preferrence its the sacrafice of gameplay vs higher visual fidelity.

Sacrifice of game play? lol.....maybe for you.

 

So you would prefer Gran Turismo 5 if it were 30FPS but had better looking cars/scenery? You would prefer Street Fighter 4 if it looked even more photorealistic at 30FPS? You would prefer Uncharted 2 at 20FPS with better graphics because the framerate has nothing to do with gameplay?

Um, I don't harp on 60fps. Many games don't run at it and are just fine. Such an argument is pointless IMO.

Many games do run it and are the best sellers in their class.

Nintendo games = 60FPS generally.

Gran Turismo = 60FPS

Call of Duty 4-6 = 60FPS

So its not pointless, it does have relevance. If it was pointless then none of the above would bother with 60hz and instead would focus on having better graphics. Obviously theres a positive tradeoff with that technology. Infact Halo 3 renders 60FPS which gives the game incredible responsiveness for a 30FPS title.