Killzone 2 > MW2

[Solid_Raiden]

heruamon said:

Solid_Raiden said:
lol at the 360 fans coming in here and bashing Killzone 2. Honestly, some of the people posting anti Killzone 2 crap in here don't own a ps3 and have never played the game. Heruamon, I'm looking at you since your the most recent! Do you do anything but talk about and compare ps games you've never played to other titles (first it was GoW which you admitted to never playing and yet continued a lengthy argument with every one who did in the Dante's Inferno thread). You can't tell me there aren't enough quality 360 games to discuss, I know better.

As for the topic. I greatly preferred Killzone 2's multiplayer. Between the switching objectives which combine all game modes into one round (this was a great new idea for online but no one ever gives the game it's credit), the depth of the classes all of which are fun to play with and master and maybe with the exception of the Assault class are all very well balanced, and what I would call the best maps in an online FPS this gen (tied with COD4 actually) it all adds up to an incredible mp that I was addicted to for months which is much longer then I stick with games. I like to bounce from game to game as they are released. That said, I'm in the camp that believes the Single player was mediocre, with a poorly fleshed out story and very dislikable characters. Meanwhile, I very much enjoyed the MW2 campaign. MW2 <<<< MW though in every way to me. I dislike the mp in MW2 but Cod4 had the best of both worlds. A superior single player (barely) and a superior multiplayer. I loved every COD4 map but I've found myself only like 2 MW2 maps.

LMAO @ the thought that if a game sells more it's better. How would the people who bought MW2 and not KZ2 know which is better if they never bought Killzone 2??!?! How many ps3 owners who got sucked into the hype of MW2 never even heard of Killzone 2? Either way, they are both great games and you can't lose with either.

I'm not bashing KZ...I'm pointing out the fact that a vast majority of PS3 owners, choose MW2 over KZ2...so why is it that if KZ is highly superior to MW2, this happened?  Sales doesn't mean MW2 is a better game, but it's riddiculous to say KZ is so far superior to  MW2.  We are talking about video games here, not battle simulators...evidently, alot of CONSUMERS (you know, the reason games are made) don't feel the same.  It's one thing to say I'm trolling if I compared Halo 3 to KZ2, but MW2 has been very well received on the PS3, and in reading most of the PS3 fans on this thread, they'd make it seem like MW2 is crap compared to KZ2...and you say I'm trolling?

I know that a lot of the people who said game x is better then game y at least played both of them. You however came into the playstation forums, not owning a ps3, and entered a thread about a game you never played which was evident by the title of the thread and surprise, surprise make a baseless comment that would claim that somehow the game that actually appears on your console and that you can play is superior by some half assed logic that sales actually somehow determine the quality of a game over the opinion's of people who have actually played both games. People come in here having played both games and give an opinion from that and then you have people like you that and somehow suggest that sales would disagree and maybe even somehow lower the opinion of the op. What does "this game sold more so more people liked it better" have any worthwile merit in response to a person saying "I liked this game better"? And maybe other people on either side of the fence have done the same thing you have, but I'd show them the door along with you, you were just the closest one in arms reach. I hope you don't go in class and try to teach, citing the fact that people like you better because you have more friends on facebook to the instructor. Actually, I hope you do.