I completely agree with the KZ2 part. I however, completely disagree with MW2 statements. I played Spec-Ops on MW2 (on 360) and it was SO BORING. The AI was flawed like crazy and gameplay just felt like shit. Played through most of the scenarios and I can say that 90% of them were pure shit! I also see someone here say KZ sacrifices gameplay for graphics and that MW2 sacrifices graphics for gameplay?? I then wonder why KZ2 runs 12 vs 12 (is it? or 16 vs 16?) and MW2 only run 6 vs 6. REALLY??!?!?! 6 vs 6??? That is a laughing matter for a 2009 game, which also is praised all over as the definite online FPS. I must say, I find KZ2 way more deep than MW2 could ever be. Pure run and gun noob fest is not deep. Maybe MW2's maps are a bit better, but they are still a BIG STEP DOWN from old IW standards. I also think that the dynamic flow of KZ2's gameplay modes is much better than just playing a game of TDM or Capture the Object, Headquarters or whatever.
KZ2 is a much better game. I don't care about opinions of the masses.. I see someone here say that when 2 games cater to almost the same demography, sales can help us find out which is the better game?? Well, I guess you feel the same way with music, movies and other forms of entertainment?? That's why you (or your kids) listen to Britney Spears and all those other MTV artists and recognize their incredible talent right? That's also why you (or your kids) are following Hannah Montana and High School Musical and recognize the talent behind these shows/movies right? Because sales = quality, right???
and lol ye, MW2 has much better and more stable latency than KZ2 right?!?! Don't make me laugh so hard please.....
Essay Pro