| Lingyis said: on the other hand, it's equally bad, if not worse, that GreenPeace decides to give them a zero. this is equally irresponsible from their part--feels like a power struggle, in that they try to show Nintendo what they can do instead of actually educating consumers and providing a fair assessment of environmental impact.
sensationalism--that's what they're going for. too bad really.
ps. actually, not quite sensationalism. i give up trying to come up with a word to describe green peace. |
I would think Greenpeace tried to give a fair assessment of Nintendo by asking for information, and were thus denied the opportunity to do so. Greenpeace is only making what information they have available to the public so they can make a decision for themselves. Nintendo should have understood the ramifications of their decision not to give Greenpeace information.
