You know it's a biased review when he goes and bashes the wiimote, saying it's only good for mini-games. If someone gave a PS3 shooter poor marks because 'the wiimote is way better for aiming than dual analog', that would be a biased review in the same way this is.
And that it lacks beauty?? WHAT?!?!? It's absolutely gorgeous artistically, and pretty good technically, too.
I have a feeling that him saying he's been playing through it for a week means he got the first ten stars and came to the opinion he was already planning on coming to from the beginning. He had a pre-concieved notion (that the game was overrated), he clearly didn't play nearly the entire game, and he was just looking for reasons to back up his pre-concieved notions about the game.
What a hack.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
