Rath on 26 November 2007
| DMeisterJ said: Why is it that every review that isn't glowing for SMG is "biased"? Maybe he just didn't like the game? I'm not defending him, I'm defending anyone that gave the game a 8.9 or below. They may not have had the fun that anyone personally has had with the game. Some people really liked HS even though it was panned, and some games like Z&W are critically loved but not bought. It may just be that he doesn't like the game. Just saying |
Because the review is so clearly biased.
I mean his comment about looking the same as games from 2001?
Lets take a comparable game that was high quality in 2002.
Claiming that SMG looks worse than that is like claiming that the PS3 is currently outselling the Wii, its just plain wrong.
