When Bayonetta released in Japan,one of the biggest Japanese publisher and reviewer reviewed the game and gave the 360 version perfect 40/40 and the PS3 version 38/40.Yeah,the 360 version is better and40/40 is a great score.But as reviewed by Famitsu,PS3 got 38/40 and that is also a great score.
So by Famitsu's point of view there 360 version of Bayonetta was perfect but PS3 version wasn't much behind even if the port was a bad one.But when one of the biggest western reviewer IGN,reviewed both the versions.The 360 version scored 9.5 and PS3 version scored 8.2.Now that's a big difference.
Now the game that got reviewed in Japan and the one in the West was the same,just the voice acting would have changed for the game.But why was there so much difference between the PS3 and 360 scores in the West and the PS3 version score in the West and in Japan.
There seems to be something wrong with IGN or Famitsu.Many people are accusing IGN was paid to show a big difference between 360 and PS3 versions.
And the IGN reviewer also said "Bayonetta 360 was the best Action game he has ever played".So does that mean it is better than God of War,lol........
