By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 15 December 2009
Edit Thread
darthdevidem01 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
You know what? I'm done. You've already made up your mind and no amount of facts or logic will ever change it. Enjoy your delusions.

You've not shown any logic or facts, all you've said is diversity and make both, ignoring that 2D can be even more diverse, and cheaper and less time consuming, and it won't fail, as Gameboy and DS have proved, so what is your supporting argument, even your idea that 3D sells more is only based on one game, lol, a game that came out more than 10 years ago and whose 3D successors haven't been able to match.

money money money money profit profit profit profit

gosh, thank god devs don't think like you all the time, the industry wouldn't move forward!


  So the losses of most of the third parties is them moving forward?

So making 2D games & MW clones (which WILL bring profits) is moving forward?

I am a gamer avinash, not a shareholder

I know whats moving forward for me

Actually, it is darth.

There is no point in moving foward if it means you're walking off a cliff.

I mean... look at the PS3.  What do you think would happen to the videogame industry if everybody kept releasing PS3s?

It'd crash... and no more videogames.

What's healthiest for the videogame market is healthiest for the gamer... because you know... it means more games will exist and be created.

What's healthiest for the market is making what people want to buy.


Of course if they got rid of 3D marios.  My guess is the 2D marios would lose some appeal from constantly being recycled... but hey... 2D games definitly don't get enough play.

 

I mean look at FF6 for example.  Now I know you have to think THAT is better then Mario Galaxy and Uncharted 2.

 

Think about it this way.  Would you rather have 3-4 FF6 like games... or 1 FF13 like game?

 

I'd take the FF6 games myself.