By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
getsallad said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:

But if 2D makes more profit and sells more consoles, why have one Galaxy when you can have 2 NSMB's, why have one prime or other M when you can have two super metroids, why an OoT when you can have two LttPs

What keeps them from making both Mario Galaxy and NSMB? Obviously they have man-power enough to do so right now, so why wouldn't they in the future?

It's not like Mario Galaxy doesn't net them profit. In fact, it's a rather successful game. It doesn't make any sense to stop making it because a game in another genre sells more.

Roughly, you're using the same logic as this:

Mario games sell more than Zelda games. Hence, we will stop making Zelda games.

If it takes 2-3 years to make a Galaxy and 1 year to make an NSMB Wii, you get better sales on the NSMB Wii at higher profits, you can use all that manpower to make a second game of a different title even a third, sure you can have the manpower, but look at Nintendo, 3D games take a lot of time to make, for no real gain.



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)