WilliamWatts on 15 December 2009
| CGI-Quality said: From my perspective, outside of Gran Turismo and Final Fantasy, PlayStation hasn't been the home to many HUGE sellers. It's always been about a plethora of games to play, that mostly do decent enough to warrant buzz and hype for future titles. PS3 really is no different in many respects, although there are some exclusive PS2 and PS1 franchises that performed a bit better than PS3 exclusives. Some of that has to do with the early lackluster marketing, and sole Blu-ray player purposes (meaning PS3s only bought as a movie player). Point is, PlayStation has never been defined by HUGE sellers, but decent-great sellers who's gaming libraries are aplenty. |
With all due respect and I do respect your opinion from when I was lurking here I don't feel you've addressed my points. I wasn't talking about the variety of games available but the decisions made by Sony especally in relation to the local multiplayer elements in their games. I feel they lose out on a lot of sales because they don't make as compelling a case for people to own the software in comparison to just renting it.
