| Alterego-X said: You are just using disruption as a buzzword. Disruptive innovation doesn't just mean "Big Damn Innovation", and sustaining inovation doesn't just mean "meh! innovation". It is a complex business theory, defined by Prof. Clayton Christensen, and as he said, its very simplest definition is "crummy products for crummy customers". This is what it means. Period.
|
Maelstrom was the one using it as a buzzword, I'm trying to get my facts straight.
Does Diruptive Innovation need to use weaker techniques in some areas only to make up for it in others? The way Maelstrom keeps using it seems too be a very weak interpretation to me.
The BuShA owns all!







