Profcrab said:
There is a trip throught the way back machine. X-Com was a really good game. In it's own way, it would still hold up too. It was one of the first PC games I ever played (not counting my early Mac Infocom games). The Witcher is a decent game, but nothing earth shattering. It seemed like it was trying to be an RPG but went through stages almost like a shooter. I thought Mass Effect did a better job, it's only problem was that if a person was good at targeting with a controller, the game got very easy at times. I also disagree with you about MGS4. While the cutscenes are WAY overdone and WAY too long with bad dialog, the game play elements are still strong and thats what ultimately carries the game into being a pretty good game. I give that post a 9.4. |
See I can't say MGS4 had good gameplay. It was great. The problem was all the fucking talking.. and talking... and talking... 10 hours of friken talking. That makes me rate it as a movie, given how I spent more time watching that than I did the Godfather. As such it is utter crap. FF:Spirits Within was better than MGS4. As you know the FF movie sucked, so that says a lot. Gameplay was good, now if only Snake good stfu and Kojima learns how to make story for a game then it would have been a freaking amazing game. I read that he wanted to be a director, and thank god he wasn't cause he would have been worse tha Uwe Boll (look at his newest movie not based on a game).
As for the Witcher, it wasn't an open world RPG but neither do I see how you went by stages as a shooter.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








