Is gameinformer even trying to hide their trolling anymore? 6.5 for SH:SM

[cAPSLOCK]

Gh0st4lifE said:
Then stop reading them... Do you really expect all journalists to consider graphics as unimportant ?


I'm sorry to say this but they are doing their job. If their opinion is that a golf game didn't really need the extra-content but better graphics and more precise controls instead then let them be and move to an all-Nintendo site.

Is this a jokepost?

Never said graphics were not important, but to say they're the king deciding factor and hold them to the standard of PS360 graphics is bullshit. If we were going by "ONE STANDARD FOR ALL" then why don't all console FPS games automatically lose 2 points for handling like trying to paint with boxing gloves compared to the PC or PS360 graphics being crap because of low resolution and pathetic draw distance (GTA 4 is a good example)?

They're doing their job but the problem is they suck ass at their job, which is the whole point of this thread. Were you actually going to contribute to the conversation or did you just come in to drop your hip, edgy, totally-in-your-face wisdom on us all?

The "just a golf game" wasn't really just any golf game, it's the first perfect 1:1 control golf game that had a LOT of added content and it further illustrated the point the OP was trying to make.  The PS30 version had less precise controls, less content, same online, and the only single solitary thing it had going for it was graphics.