coolbeans said:
Munkeh111 said:
coolbeans said:
Munkeh111 said:
coolbeans said:
Munkeh111 said:
@ coolbeans, concerning Rainbow Six, do you really think they can set a 3rd one in Vegas? 1 was fantastic, but in 2 you kind of felt like you were retreading old ground, but more TC games will certainly be coming next year! |
Hmmm....you could be right, I forgot to consider that fact. I would personally like another go at Vegas but some place like Tokyo or new casinos in Vegas would be awesome.
|
They tried to explore the seedier side in Vegas 2, but I didn't like that. I think more variety would be good. I did like the casino environment, but 3 games in the same city! It is too many
|
To each his own, I just enjoyed the first one so much that I wouldn't might another one set there or perhaps make it the main location for most missions but head to a few other locales as well. I mean c'mon, this is the first story that hasn't stayed in Vegas  .
|
shakes head....
I wouldn't mind a finale through the casinos, but the wow factor of gunning through casino is diminished after the 10th time. I don't think it was helped the sucky story. I was looking at the wiki page, and there is a whole section about continuity problems between the first 2 games
|
Yeah I noticed that too but most of those seem to be about R6's in the past gens, last I checked. I guess it comes down to personal preference, but I don't think the wow factor has been that dimished personally. They just need more dynamic set pieces that Call of Duty has done so well at.
|
Remeber there were flashbacks in RSV 2, and they had an interweaving story, that didn't quite weave...
Well RS doesn't need as many set pieces as CoD, much of the fun of the game is sneaking up and executing a well planned move
