By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
naznatips on 09 December 2009
Edit Thread
Squilliam said:
naznatips said:
Vetteman94 said:

So basically you are saying replace a real controller with a virtual one?  And how would that replace universal remotes that control mulitple sources? 

Not to mention you've just replaced something simple and quick to use with something that's signifficantly more difficult and slower.

Sure when you've got one combined DVD + TV and you've only got one remote and you only get channels 0-9, then sure you could say its quick and easy to use. However when you've got over 100 channels, a remote for the cable for the DVD player, for the stereo, for the tv then hell yes Natal is faster and easier. You could have the remote in your hand and Natal would probably beat you to changing the TV input from the cable to the PS3 with my setup at least.

So your defense of natal is that you will not get off your ass and go buy a cheap and much more effective universal remote?

PS with my remote I run my TV, volume, AT&T u-verse with hundreds of channels, switch inputs, and adjust my surround sound. With one remote. Half of which Natal will never be able to interface wtih.