Why Nintendo should let the next 2D Mario be on PlayStation 3

[Nintendogamer]

Carl2291 said:

Nintendogamer said:

Carl2291 said:

Nintendogamer said:

Carl2291 said:
Oh, okay.

I still think K's suck though.

Now, back to the topic of how Mario needs Sackboy's advice, please.

Mario knows everything sackboy knows,  It is most likely the reason sackboy exists due to 2D platfrom ideas.

Wrong, Mario doesn't know difficulty.

Mario doesn't know level creation.

And most importantly, Mario doesn't know how to get a game on PSP.

This way, he will know.

Mario wouldn't know the diffculty of a level since he relies entirley o nthe player and only that player could justify difficulty.  Mario doesn't need to know level creation since the player would be in charge of the construction, and why would he want to know how to get a game on PSP while he's simply happy enough on the DS.

Exactly, and as already stated in this thread, Mario doesn't have a difficulty... LBP does. This is why LBP > Mario in the eyes of the industry, and gamers alike.

The player being in charge of the construction is a good thing, and also offers limitless opportunities for awesome levels. Not just a few worlds.

DS doesnt have PS3 interoperability. PSP does. Therfore PSP wins!

LBP might have difficulty but sakcboy doesn't.  Well of course if the player wasn't in charge of construction, who else would be?  a few worlds? 76 worlds isn't a few and let's not forget that punishing levels of world 9.

DS hasn't got PS3 interoperbility but it has got Wii interoperbility and PSP doesn't have Wii interoperbility. So therefore it's a tie! not a tie and shirt just a tie.