| LordTheNightKnight said: "You're imagining that those same games could be decent at 1/4th the budget, and that's just not true." I did NOT write that it cost that little. If you're just going to make up points we make to pretend you can counter them, I will ask you to leave the thread. |
I was just using the commonly quoted number from John Ritticello, from a couple years back. I didn't claim it was "your" number.
If you've never believed said number was referring to anything but shovelware budgets, that's great -- very insightful of you. However, your post claimed that, somehow, moving projects the Wii, rather than the HDs, they would inherently become profitable. I don't think you provided any backing to support that (or can provide it), so I (mistakenly, it seems) assumed you believed in the "all things Wii are cheap and 1/4th the price of HD things" fallacy.
LordTheNightKnight: "They could save a hell of a lot of money putting at least a third of those big games on the Wii. Market unpredictability is just their BS to avoid putting those games on the system."
Feel free to support your theory above with some ideas of your own, about how publishers can just turn things around and begin making the big bucks on the Wii. We would all like to read it, if its interesting, I'm certain.
Just blowing smoke and saying that's-how-it-is is something that... well should entail you leaving the thread, as you say so brashly above. It adds nothing. Its propaganda, or, as you put it... "BS".
