By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NJ5 said:
jammy2211 said:
NJ5 said:
jammy2211 said:
NJ5 said:
jammy2211 said:

Assassin's Creed 2 is exceeding expectations, why are people doubting it's profitability? Unless Ubisoft expected it to lose money 0_o.

To be clear, my point is that it could not make a great profit depending on how sales end up. Sequels often sell less than their predecessors despite being more frontloaded.

 

On the other hand, Frontloaded games tend to be more profitable as they're selling more copies at a higher price.

 They'd only make a sequel if the original made plenty of money; and if that sequel is exceeding expectations you'd assume it's making more money then the original :/.

Of course it's making more revenue than the original, so far... that's not in question.

 

Thus it's making more profit - people have already explained the 450 number is an inflated figure (No doubt used to 'wow' people into thinking the game would be awesome), and I could easily counter argue the game will have cheaper developement costs then the original, now they have the Engine up and running and more experience with the HD platforms. It's all just speculation though, all we've got to go on is the game selling more copies then the original thus far, at a higher price point on average 0_o.

 

That's not how the software business works... all the money is already spent before you start collecting revenue, so you don't make profit until you've covered all the costs.

AC2 is making more revenue... how much of a profit it will make depends on its legs, which are completely unknown at this point.

 

Erm, I'm pretty sure it's legs are irrelevent if it sells gangbusters up to new years day. Legs on a HD game normally count less towards profits as that's when it's been reduced and it's profit per copy is thus less, hence why all these publishers are so desperate to make their games frontloaded and base their marketing campaigns on a 1 months blitz.

 Your current reply assumes they spent significiently more developing AC2, which you've no real evidence for (Note, the 450 figure has already been explained as infalted). Although my reasoning is still speculative, the fact Ubisoft say it's exceeding expectations tends to suggest it's making plenty of profit, as I'm pretty sure Ubisoft were expecting a handsome profit without sales exceeding those expected 0_o.