| naznatips said: It's easy to SAY there should be a simple way around accidentally adjusting things with gestures, but what's the actual solution to this? A completely crazy gesture that takes forever to do and makes you feel like a moron? A vocal code that you could still accidentally say during conversation? A button to activate the motion controls, in which case it's easier to just hold a controller anyway? This just seems like an incredibly stupid idea. |
| Naum said: Change channel with a flick of my hand?? NOOOOO!11! how am I now going to watch p0rn without changing channel right in the middle of "it"???  |
ROTFL! Two quite effective ways to describe potential flaws, drawbacks and undesirable side effects of the idea!
| Lord Flashheart said: People are immediately disregarding Natal because it's made by MS. If it was made by the manufacturer of their choice they would be wetter between the legs than a teenage girl at the mention of Twilight. |
This is in part due to people fearing MS gains even more power than the excessive amount it already has, in part due to bad MS record about working, ergonomic and user friendly ideas, although undeniably it did good things too, but they are rarer than bad or unfriendly ones (some quick examples, Win95 just released crap, Win95 OSR2.x acceptable, Win98 crap, Win98SE good, Win ME crap, Win NT <=4.x good but unfriendly, Win 2000 since SP4 very good, but still not friendly enough, Win XP just released crap, Win XP SP>=2 very good, Vista crap, Win 7 looks promising, same pattern for Office, even worse situation for IE, Java implementations deliberately made sloppy and lazily updated to damage Java and Sun, same thing for OpenGL, only DirectX since version 5.x shows undeniably an ever bettering trend): were the idea developed by Nintendo or Apple we could be a lot more optimistic about its success.
So are we biased against MS? Maybe, but maybe you are biased for it, nobody is neutral, call us trolls and we got the same right to call you astroturfer.
