bdbdbd on 28 November 2009
The big problem isn't Metacritic as it is the reviewers who give scores based on:
1. Bribery.
2. Blackmail.
3. Based on whether the 37:th sequel to a franchise is better than 29:th, which they happened to give a good score, despite the game sucking hard.
What i found funny was the uncle looking for a game with good score with appropriate age rating for little Timmy. These are very rare, whether it's because of devs not making the kind of good games or reviewers not giving good scores for the type of games.
And ok, i get the guys point, his problem was that Metacritic benefits Nintendo?
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
