Would developers give a Wii HD the games they denied the Wii so far?

[Nick]

BMaker11 said:

Nick said:

Boneitis said:

Nick said:

Boneitis said:

bdbdbd said:
Also, as Avinash said, there's big demand for quality games on Wii, which is proven by the first party sales. Then again, there aren't that many quality titles on the HD systems either.

Nintendo has proven their games are in huge demand with every console they've released. If every 3rd party developer could just create what Nintendo does everyone would be rich.

If you don't think the HD consoels have many quality titles, than the Wii must be abysmal. That's just an ignorant comment.

It seems that you are implying that only games that you or the "hardcore" gamers would like as quality. 

ESPECIALLY when you follow it with comments like "Also the userbase seems to be mostly intrigued with genres like party games, edutainment, and anything Mario." 

Just because it's not a game designed for a 16-24 year old male doesn't mean it's not a quality title.  There are a ton of quality titles on the Wii that appearantly just don't appeal to YOU.  There are a lot of people out there (56.69M) that they do appeal to. 

I'm definitely saying the HD consoles offer superior titles. But if you're a Nintendo fan, 1st party is great on the Wii.

Those 56.69M want 1st party games. Even with that large userbase it moves less 3rd party software than the 360.

HD consoles offer superior titles TO YOU, but most of the Wii owners don't want those games or they would be purchasing Xbox or PS3.  They're buying the Wii because it offers superior titles TO THEM.

Those 56.69M don't want 1st party games, they want quality games.  The Wii isn't 56.69M Ninty fanboys.  That's just another tired excuse that you're repeating.  A very large portion of Wii owners are new gamers that purposefuly purchase what they know will be quality software. 

The Wii moves less 3rd party software than the 360 because it doesn't get real attempts by 3rd party developers, hence the whole point of this entire thread.

If the games that are already available to Wii owners are already of so much quality TO THEM, then why are you guys complaining, or rather, bringing up the topic of whether or not 3rd parties will support the Wii more? They don't have to, and if the Wii audience already has superior titles...TO THEM, then what's there to worry about? You already have your quality titles, why complain that games that are on other systems don't come to the Wii.

That's like saying: "PS3 owners think that the PS3 offers superior titles TO THEM....but they're going to continue to ask why PC developers don't put their games on the console.".

Plain and simple, if you're so content with the games that are superior, TO YOU, why do you need the other games so much? Wii is at almost 57M sold, and it did it without Assassin's Creed, GTA, Metal Gear, etc. People buying Wiis didn't say "3rd parties aren't putting Game X on the Wii, so I ain't buying". Week in and week out, the Wii sells gangbusters without those games, so obviously the demographic doesn't really care that these third parties aren't supporting the console in the same way the're supporting HD

My issue (and I think a lot of peoples issue) is that 3rd parties churn out crap and then publicly blame Wii customers for not purchasing that crap.  Whether or not they support the Wii more I don't really care.  I'll never catch up and fully own and play all of the games I want for the Wii anyways.

This is the point I was making in most of my posts if you read through them.  They don't care because there is a lot of software available that appeals TO THEM.  It's simply incorrect to say that the Wii's software is not quality and inferior to games on XBOX/PS3 simply because it doesn't appeal to that specific userbase.  Statements like that reak of elitism.