Boneitis said:
Nick said:
Boneitis said:
bdbdbd said:
Also, as Avinash said, there's big demand for quality games on Wii, which is proven by the first party sales. Then again, there aren't that many quality titles on the HD systems either. |
Nintendo has proven their games are in huge demand with every console they've released. If every 3rd party developer could just create what Nintendo does everyone would be rich.
If you don't think the HD consoels have many quality titles, than the Wii must be abysmal. That's just an ignorant comment.
|
It seems that you are implying that only games that you or the "hardcore" gamers would like as quality.
ESPECIALLY when you follow it with comments like "Also the userbase seems to be mostly intrigued with genres like party games, edutainment, and anything Mario."
Just because it's not a game designed for a 16-24 year old male doesn't mean it's not a quality title. There are a ton of quality titles on the Wii that appearantly just don't appeal to YOU. There are a lot of people out there (56.69M) that they do appeal to.
|
I'm definitely saying the HD consoles offer superior titles. But if you're a Nintendo fan, 1st party is great on the Wii.
Those 56.69M want 1st party games. Even with that large userbase it moves less 3rd party software than the 360.
|
HD consoles offer superior titles TO YOU, but most of the Wii owners don't want those games or they would be purchasing Xbox or PS3. They're buying the Wii because it offers superior titles TO THEM.
Those 56.69M don't want 1st party games, they want quality games. The Wii isn't 56.69M Ninty fanboys. That's just another tired excuse that you're repeating. A very large portion of Wii owners are new gamers that purposefuly purchase what they know will be quality software.
The Wii moves less 3rd party software than the 360 because it doesn't get real attempts by 3rd party developers, hence the whole point of this entire thread.
Smash Bros: 2363-5325-6342 
