Many members on this forum will have to agree that too many review sites score unfairly, sometimes they may have a console biast or 'other incentives' (read: lair) and other times the reviewers spend too much time focusing on graphics.
How about we, as a community, discuss and award maybe 5,6 awards a month (typically one game for each
platform) to games we thought excelled above excellence. These awards should primarily be issued for gameplay, graphics and other things should be taken account for, but not as priority.
There should be guidlines, but they won't be strict. Maybe we could have a rule stating that the game must be 10 hours minimum, but exceptions could be made if the game offers loads of replayability, and multiplayer - and if the realitivly short campaign is complete gold the whole way through.
What do you guys (et gals) think?
