Killergran on 22 November 2009
Seems I'll have to improve the analysis then. :)
I understand what you are saying, and I will readily agree that this IS a problem, for now. I don't think it's invalidating the entire analysis (or I wouldn't have made it), I still think the basis is very sound, but I can see why you have problems accepting something with such big holes in it.
That's totally going to be a pain in the butt. If there's anything I DO NOT want to do it's to dig up every single weekly data, but on the other hand... maybe I won't have to. I could do it based on 13 week averages. I'll include that in the next one, shouldn't be all that painful.
Thanks for the input.
This is invisible text!
