| Kasz216 said: Yeah, it's a pretty funny response. They don't actually bother to debate anything but instead talk about how their wasn't a master list, even though there is a lot of proof multiple orginzations either altered data unscientifically or presented to the public facts which they knew weren't facts. |
I dunno - IMO this whole affair seems to be more about human error and poor judgement/methods at worst, rather than a politically minded plot to quash opposing views on AGW.
Either way, this'll only create a mess - if scientists find some other climate-related issues that could screw up the planet even worse, incidents like these just make it harder to convice anyone about these hazards.
And on a side note - I don't personally think climate change should factor into researching alternative energy sources at all, at least not over shaking our fatal dependency on finite, non-renewable substances like fossil fuels and uranium.
Warning: The preceding message may or may not have included sarcasm, cynicism, irony, full stops, commas, slashes, words, letters, sentences, lines, quotes, flaeed gramar, cryptic metaphors or other means of annoying communication. Viewer discretion is/was strongly advised.
