By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Procrastinato said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
That only means Nintendo gets money from third parties, and you seem to forget the other first parties can do exactly the same thing, while providing no proof anyway, just speculation.

I'm not speculating, and yes, the other first parties benefit in the same way from licensing fees.

I'm talking about why 3rd parties shy away from the Wii.  Don't turn this into a Sony-MS-Nintendo business model comparison -- it's not.

But what you described is not a pyramid scheme.

And if it applies to the other two, it's not a reason. Unless the third parties are stupid enough to think it's somehow bad to do the very same thing with the Wii.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs