Avinash_Tyagi said:
Read his full articles they are far better than his blog posts |
I'd second this. What actually drew me to Malstrom was how he was going left while every thing else was going right. He Provided (for me) an alternative view on the happenings with gaming. What was of great interest was how in the world Nintendo was able to accomplish what they did with the Wii this generation and the talk of blue ocean and disruption in relation to gaming was an informative read. I can see how some (many) people may find this persona annoying but I feel the grandure nature of it is part of his appeal like him or loathe him.
After reading Birdman fallacy and even some of his earlier articles preceeding that one he called the Wii's success before anyone else and he was right so I don't just take what he says with a grain of salt. I don't agree with everything he says, though. And I'm not supposed to. Just like I don't agree with everything Nintendo does. I'm not some sort of parrot, I think for myself and I think others should do this more often as well. And I've definitely taken notice of your posting history, I've been here long enough ;) I wasn't trying to call you out in particular I was actually being broad in that anytime a malstrom article or blog is posted in a thread the discussion always veers off into what an asshole the guy is.
Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:
If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.
If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.







