We all know that VGChartz is being attacked on various fronts for not having accurate data, and for the numbers to be subject to change at any moment without notice. To gain some insight into the validity of this critisism and satisfy my personal curiosity I started The Weekly adjustments thread. I've been using a spreadsheet to do the simplest calculations I could possibly do on VGChartz hardware adjustments for the three consoles in the three big terretories. So far, all I have done is gather data. Now I thought it could be interesting to look at this data and see what I've learned.
Before I start I must apologize for any inaccurasies, misspellings and other mistakes, as well as the rambling and incoherent nature of this analysis. I will do my best, but suggestions and constructive critisism is very welcome.
Now, onto the numbers!
Sales for the consoles since I started measuring (12 weeks):
| Console | Wii | PS3 | X360 |
|
Total
|
3,847,616
|
3,509,679
|
2,013,190
|
|
America
|
1,711,161
|
1,227,225
|
1,137,257
|
|
Japan
|
289,097
|
555,166
|
56,284
|
|
Total Others
|
1,847,358
|
1,727,288
|
819,649
|
The weekly average for each console is:
Wii - 320k
PS3 - 290k
Xbox - 170k
These numbers gives us the base against which we can judge the adjustments.
Taking the sum of the absolute values of each weeks adjustment gives us the following table:
| ABSOLUTE ADJUSTMENTS |
Total Adjustments | Average weekly Adjustments |
| Wii |
|
|
| Total | 415 090 | 34 591 |
| America | 35 000 | 2 917 |
| Japan | 6 607 | 551 |
| Total Others | 394 291 | 32 858 |
| PS3 | ||
| Total | 201 532 | 16 794 |
| America | 71 000 | 5 917 |
| Japan | 83 140 | 6 928 |
| Total Others | 49 836 | 4 153 |
| X360 | ||
| Total | 213 374 | 17 781 |
| America | 0 | 0 |
| Japan | 2 971 | 248 |
| Total Others | 212 547 | 17 712 |
To get the cumulative total adjustment for the period you simply add all adjustments together:
| CUMULATIVE ADJUSTMENTS | ||
| Wii | Total | Weekly Average |
| Total | 246 320 | 20 527 |
| America | 35 000 | 2 917 |
| Japan | 3 793 | 316 |
| Total Others | 207 527 | 17 294 |
| 0 | ||
| PS3 | 0 | |
| Total | 122 198 | 10 183 |
| America | 71 000 | 5 917 |
| Japan | 17 766 | 1 481 |
| Total Others | 33 432 | 2 786 |
| 0 | ||
| X360 | 0 | |
| Total | -181 426 | -15 119 |
| America | 0 | 0 |
| Japan | 875 | 73 |
| Total Others | -182 301 | -15 192 |
All numbers combined gives us the full picture:
| Average weekly VGChartz current numbers | Average Absolute Adjustments | % Difference | Average Cumulative Adjustments |
% Difference |
|
| Wii | |||||
| Total | 320 635 | 34 591 | 10,79% | 20 527 | 6,40% |
| America | 142 597 | 2 917 | 2,05% | 2 917 | 2,05% |
| Japan | 24 091 | 551 | 2,29% | 316 | 1,31% |
| Total Others | 153 947 | 32 858 | 21,34% | 17 294 | 11,23% |
| PS3 | |||||
| Total | 292 473 | 16 794 | 5,74% | 10 183 | 3,48% |
| America | 102 269 | 5 917 | 5,79% | 5 917 | 5,79% |
| Japan | 46 264 | 6 928 | 14,98% | 1 481 | 3,20% |
| Total Others | 143 941 | 4 153 | 2,89% | 2 786 | 1,94% |
| X360 | |||||
| Total | 167 766 | 17 781 | 10,60% | -15 119 | -9,01% |
| America | 94 771 | 0 | 0,00% | 0 | 0,00% |
| Japan | 4 690 | 248 | 5,28% | 73 | 1,55% |
| Total Others | 68 304 | 17 712 | 25,93% | -15 192 | -22,24% |
So what does this awful table really mean? For the sake of clarity I'll take an example. The Wii has sold an average of 320k per week. During these 12 weeks it been adjusted both up and down by an average of 33k every week, or 21.34% (Absolute adjustment). The result of these adjustments is, in the end, that it lies on average 17k above the originally reported numbers every week, or 11.23% (Cumulative adjustment).
The result I've come up with is this - The originally reported VGChartz hardware numbers are accurate to within +-10%. During these 12 weeks adjustments have indicated that the Xbox is being overtracked by 9%, with all of those numbers coming from others. The PS3 is being undertracked by 3.5%, and the Wii is being undertracked by 11% in others, resulting in a 6.4% overall undertracking.
When looking at the weekly averages for the last 12 weeks and how they have changed, the picture changes quite a bit:
| Average weekly VGChartz numbers |
Original weekly VGChartz numbers |
% Difference | |
| Wii | |||
| Total | 320 635 | 310 864 | 3,05% |
| America | 142 597 | 139 680 | 2,05% |
| Japan | 24 091 | 23 732 | 1,49% |
| Total Others | 153 947 | 147 452 | 4,22% |
| PS3 | |||
| Total | 292 473 | 269 654 | 7,80% |
| America | 102 269 | 96 352 | 5,79% |
| Japan | 46 264 | 44 798 | 3,17% |
| Total Others | 143 941 | 128 504 | 10,72% |
| X360 | |||
| Total | 167 766 | 169 112 | -0,80% |
| America | 94 771 | 94 771 | 0,00% |
| Japan | 4 690 | 4 671 | 0,41% |
| Total Others | 68 304 | 69 670 | -2,00% |
The PS3 still has been undertracked significantly in other for this period, but overall percentages is quite predictably down quite a bit compared to the total.
That is, I think, not bad at all. VGChartz is pretty accurate with its weekly figures.
What I'm doing here is based on a simple assumption: VGChartz will adjust numbers so that they are accurate. The number of sold consoles in a year is reported, and VGChartz will adjust numbers to reflect those reports. Thus, VGChartz numbers for last year should always be more or less accurate. My goal is therefore to keep track of all adjustments made to previous figures, so that after a while looking at those adjustments can show how accurate the original VGChartz figures were.
Naturally, there are a couple of problems with this analysis. The first problem is that this is all internal VGChartz numbers. I have not gathered data from any other source, so if VGChartz is dead wrong with anything and refuses to adjust it, this analysis cannot catch that. The second problem is that my data is from a relatively short period of time (12 weeks). My numbers will get more accurate over time, but for now the adjustments made every week covers weeks that I do not have data for, which means that the above analysis serves more as a general guideline than anything else. The last problem is that I do not track adjustments made on weekly numbers, but on total cumulative numbers. That means I easily miss subtleties.
I'll try to do another set of numbercrunching when we get to 26 weeks (half a year), but I'm not sure whether or not I'll still be keeping track of this by then. For now, you'll just have to take my figures with a grain of salt.
TL;DR - Pretty accurate (I think)!
This is invisible text!







