code.samurai said:
If Namco focused on PS3 then Tekken 6 would be better than the Arcade version, load time and resolution issues would not be there. Just look at Tekken5:DR on PS3, it's way better than the Arcade version. 360 fans don't really care about fighting games anymore because of their lousy d-pad and tekken doesn't have boobs like SC4 nor leggy babes like SF4, that's why were seeing the low numbers. I think 360 fans wouldn't have cared if Tekken came out earlier, it's Micro$oft that's worried that they may lose a significant portion of their install base to PS3 if they allow PS3 to keep their exclusive titles. If M$ didn't pay for Tekken, why is it that both games were released simultaneously when the PS3 version was ready by 2008? My suspicion is M$ always muscles its way by paying or making some sort of iresistable deal to the company. |
1. You are blind and a PS3 fanboy.....and I'll prove it.
Reasons:
- You obviously have no concept of gaming history at all if you ever believe a company who specializes their fighting games for the arcade (Namco) would ever make a console version superior.
- Since when has a hot arcade fighter even outside of Namco come out superior on console ports? Hell....even a beat em up game.
- The Mad Katz PS3/360 Gamer pads and Arcade sticks are superior to the PS3 Dual Shock for fighters. Don't say 360 gamers can't play.
- Since when was expanding your userbase for profit ever a bad thing? I think you're just afraid of Sony losing exclusivity. Microsoft didn't pay Namco a dime for Tekken 6, they paid for timed exclusivity on Tales of Vesperia.
Conclusion:
Stop riding Sony's jock and play the game if you are a fan of it.